Analyzing the Bedol & Santos PCoCs

Let us now make a tally and analyze the two provincial certificates of canvass (the Bedol PCoC and the Santos PCoC).

By tallying, we get a clearer picture.

We also get to see the anomalies.

Incredible results can bee seen.

For instance, in the Bedol PCoC the percentage of actual voters who voted for Zubiri is a stratospheric high of 98.39 %!

In other words if there were one hundred voters who voted, ninety-eight voted for Zubiri.

In the canvassed Santos PCoC, the percentage of actual voters who voted for Zubiri is even higher: 98.45%!

These percentages are even higher than Zubiri's own voting percentage in his home province of Bukidnon.

Can you explain that?

Zubiri is more loved in Maguindanao, than in Bukidnon? Come on.

And not only that. look at the fill up rate: an average high of 11.74 (Bedol PCoC) and 11.36 (Santos PCoC).

When you say average "fill-up rate", this means a voter filled up an AVERAGE of 11 names for senators.

Possible or impossible?

The probable fill-up rate among average voters in the country is no more than six names.

With the Bedol and Santos PCoCs, we are made to believe that the voters who voted in Maguindanao filled-up eleven of the twelve names for senators.

Believable?

Not only that.

When Abalos set aside the Bedol PCoC, it was for the reason that the results were statistically improbable considering nineteen candidates got zero votes.

But Abalos canvassed the Santos PCoC when it still yielded eighteen candidates getting zero votes.

In the Santos PCoC, Trillanes got 2,400 votes.

Why accept the Santos PCoC as regular when it still yielded eighteen candidates getting zero votes?

With eighteen candidates still getting zero votes, it is no longer statistically improbable?

Si Abalos talaga.

But wait till you see the Pangalungan results....